Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Sikandar v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4209 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 10874 (29 June 2007)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon. Vijay Kumar Verma, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the impugned judgment.


Issue notice.

Trial court record be summoned. List on 30th July 07.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that no public witness was called at the time of alleged recovery and the appellant has been falsely implicated by the police.

It is also submitted that the appellant was on bail during trial and he has not misused the bail.

Having regard to all the facts, the appellant may be granted bail in this case.

The appellant-accused Sikandar is admitted to bail during appeal on executing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

On depositing 50% amount of fine in Trial Court, recovery of rest amount shall remain stayed.

Dt. 29.06.2007.

v.k.updh./ crl. Appeal no. 4209/07


Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.