NARENDRA KUMAR AND ANOTHER versus SURENDRA SINGH AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Narendra Kumar And Another v. Surendra Singh And Others - WRIT - C No. 28835 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 10938 (2 July 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Janardan Sahai, J.

     A suit for injunction was filed by the plaintiff/petitioner. In the said suit an application for temporary injunction was also filed. The trial court passed an order directing the parties to maintain status quo. By the impugned order the appeal of the defendant has been allowed. The finding of fact is that on the disputed property there is a school being run by the defendant and the plaintiff's possession is not established. It has also been found that the plaintiff could not establish his case that the disputed property is portion of khasra plot no. 98 being claimed by the plaintiff. The finding is one of fact and is not shown to be vitiated by any error of law, which may call for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution. Dismissed.

2.7.2007.

s..wp.28835/07.

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.