Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Krishna Madho Dubey v. Shri Jai Narain Mishra, Supdt. Engg. Nalkoop Mandal - CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. 1486 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 11469 (9 July 2007)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble Rajes Kumar, J.

Sri M. S. Pipersenia, learned Standing Counsel has filed affidavit of compliance on behalf of Sri J. N. Misra, Superintending Engineer, Nalkoop Mandal Sant Ravidas Nagar, Mirzapur.  In paragraph 7 of the affidavit, it has been stated that the petitioner has passed the High School  Examination i. e. in the year 1989, therefore, the petitioner was entitled for the regularization in the year 1989 and the petitioner was retired in the year 1991 and had completed two years in the regular service, therefore, he is not entitled for grant of pension.  In paragraph 8, it  is stated that so far as the other retiral benefits are concerned, the petitioner has already been paid the amount of gratuity for the period during which he  had worked as Work Charge employee and an amount of Rs.19,938/- has already been paid to the applicant on 30.6.2007 by Cheque no. 626001 dated 27.06.07.  In paragraph 4, it has been stated that the papers for the regularization has been forwarded to the Competent Authority i. e. the Chief Engineer, Tubewell, Varanasi on 29.06.07.  

In view of the averment made above, learned Standing Counsel submitted that the order of this Court is complied with.  Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that even though, sufficient time has been passed, but the petitioner has not been regularized.  

Learned Standing Counsel submitted that since the papers relating to the regularization since 1989 has already been forwarded on 29.06.07, necessary orders in this regard may likely to be passed very soon.

In view of the above submissions, there is no use of keeping the matter pending.  Notice is discharged.  The petition stands disposed of.  However, in case, if the order is not complied with within the reasonable period, it will be open to the applicant to move application.  

Copy of this order may be provided to the learned Standing Counsel.




Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.