Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JAI RAM YADAV versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Jai Ram Yadav v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 25788 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 11592 (10 July 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.

Heard counsel for the petitioner.

By this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 13.1.2007 passed by the District Magistrate directing for taking fresh applications for  Shiksha Mitra.  Petitioner's case in the writ petition is that his name was recommended by the Gram Shiksha Samiti which was approved by Block level which was not approved  for publication due to two complaints filed  against the selection.  Two persons have made complaint that they have  given application for  Shiksha Mitra but their names were not included in the selection by the Gram Shiksha Samiti. The District Magistrate has directed for inviting fresh applications.  The District Magistrate  has taken the view that the selection of  Shiksha Mitra has become very old and several amendments have been made regarding engagement of  Shiksha Mitra and there is possibility  of getting efficient candidates.  Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that his name was recommended by the Gram Shiksha Samiti  and he is entitled for  appointment as Shiksha Mitra.  The complaint of two persons was to the effect that although they have applied but their names have not been included in the selection. The District Magistrate being satisfied about their complaint   directed for flesh selection. I do not find any error indirecting for fresh selection. However, it is made clear that in case the petitioner makes an application his application be also considered  in accordance with law.

Subject to above the writ petition is dismissed.    

D/-10.7.2007

SCS/25788


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.