Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

NEERAJ versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Neeraj v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 28645 of 2006 [2007] RD-AH 122 (3 January 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

  Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. and Sri P.C. Srivastava, learned counsel for the complainant.

        It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that according to the prosecution version  the alleged occurrence has taken place in the night of 8.8.2006. Its F.I.R. was lodged on 9.8.2006 at about 18.45. The distance of the police station was about 9 k.m. from the alleged place of occurrence. The F.I.R. has been lodged after the post mortem examination report. The post mortem examination was conducted on 9.8.2006 at 3.45 p.m. There is a delay in lodging the F.I.R. Again in the F.I.R. it is said that the applicant has discharged shots which hit the chest of the deceased but during investigation the statement of the  wife of the deceased was recorded in which she stated that the applicant was having country made pistol  and the shot was discharged accidentally by him.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant  Neeraj  involved in case crime no.   225     of 2006  under Sections 302,307,504          I.P.C., P.S. Khair  District  Aligarh be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

Dated: 3.1.2007

NA/28645/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.