Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JASBIR & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Jasbir & Another v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 6701 of 2006 [2007] RD-AH 12223 (18 July 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Imtiyaz Murtaza, J.

Hon'ble Vijay Kumar Verma, J.

A prayer for bail has been made on behalf of the appellants, who have been convicted by the judgement and order dated 30.10.2006 passed by Addl. District & Session Judge, Court No. 9, Ghaziabad in S.T. No. 837 of 1996 and 838 of 1996 and 839 of 1996.

We have heard learned counsel for the appellants-accused and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent and also perused the record.

The learned counsel for the appellants submits that four persons were tried for offence under Section 302 and 307 I.P.C.  Two accused have been acquitted by the Trial Court.  The appellants are alleged to have entered into the house of deceased for committing theft. They are said to have been arrested by the public and country-made pistols were recovered from their possession, but the deceased sustained injury by knife.

The learned counsel for the appellants further submits that appellants had no intention to cause death and they have not been prosecuted under Section 460 I.P.C.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the appellants Jasbir and Promod be released on bail on their executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned provided the entire amount of fine be deposited in Trial Court concerned within a period of thirty days from the date of their release, failing which the bail so granted to them shall stand cancelled.

18.07.2007

Yc/Crl. Appeal No. 6701 of 2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.