Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Mahesh Singh v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 32940 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 12608 (23 July 2007)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Court No. 38

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 31940 of 2007

Dharm Veer Singh and another


State of U.P & others

Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J

Petitioners have approached this Court for issuing writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to permit the petitioners also to undertake entrance ability examination for the post of Head Constable armed police.

On the matter being taken up this fact has not been disputed  and which is also evident from the circular dated 4/5.06.2006 of U.P. Police Headquarter that in respect of Constable of PAC and in respect of Constable from Armorar for according them promotion separate examination all together is held and separate channel has been provided for Constables of PAC. and Constables of Armorar. Constables of PAC and Constables of Armorar who are on deputation in Armed Police they maintain their lien as Constable of PAC and Constable of Armorar, as such  are not at all entitled for being considered to undertake entrance examination for Head Constable as they form separate class. Once this is the position which has emerged then petitioners who are not at all member of armed police rather they are members of PAC, as such rightly they have been left out.

In the examination which was held conducted for the post of Head Constable, Police entrance ability examination held and therein due to inadvertence various constables who maintained their lien on the post of constable in PAC and Constables of Armorar police succeeded in appearing in the said examination and thereafter when said fact came to the knowledge of authorities said error has been rectified and then they  have been left out. In this background there is no error in the view which has been taken.

Consequently writ petition lacks substance and is dismissed.




Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.