Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Kaushlesh Prasad Tiwari v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 33423 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 12816 (25 July 2007)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.

Heard counsel for the petitioner, Sri R.P.Dubey appears for respondent no. 2. Learned standing counsel appears for the respondents No. 1 and 3.  No notice is being issued to the respondent no. 4 in view of the order which is being passed .

The petitioner's case is that she was selected by the U.P. Secondary  Education Service Selection Board for appointment as T.G.T. in Social Science and  the name of the petitioner was sent for posting to the Committee of Management, Brigadier Hosiar Singh Inter College, Shamli, District Muzaffarnagar - respondent no.4 but he was not  permitted to join. The District  Inspector of Schools  has written letter dated 18.4.2006 to the Secretary, U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board that the petitioner cannot be permitted to join and he be adjusted to some other institution.  Learned counsel for the petitioner contended  that rule 13 (5) has been substituted by the  U.P. Secondary  Education Service Selection Board (Second Amendment)  Rules, 2007 with effect from 23.1.2007 in accordance with that  the petitioner can be adjusted to some other institution.

Considering the facts of the case ends of justice be served in disposing of the writ petition directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with the amended rule 13(5) of the  U.P. Secondary  Education Service Selection Board (Second Amendment)  Rules, 2007. and in the light of the letter dated 18.4.2006 of the District  Inspector of Schools  Annexure-2 to the writ petition   expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.

With the above observations the writ petition is disposed of.




Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.