Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MUNNEY & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Munney & Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 4708 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 12829 (25 July 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble M.K. Mittal,J.

This appeal has been filed by Munney, Prakash and Rajeev against the judgement and order dated 19.7.2007, passed by Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Pilibhit in S.T. NO. 494 of 2003, whereby the appellant Munney has been found guilty and convicted under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(1)(10) SC/ST Act and appellant Prakash and Rajeev have been found guilty and convicted under Sections 323/34 IPC and Section 3(1)(10) SC/ST Act and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment up to six months. Fine has also been imposed on them with default stipulation.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants learned A.G.A. and perused the judgement.

Admit.

Learned counsel for the appellants has contended that the appellants are on interim bail from the Trial Court.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without prejudice to the merits of the case, the accused shall continue on bail during the pendency of the appeal on their furnishing personal bond with two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned and also on depositing the amount of fine as imposed on them.

The appellants shall give an undertaking that during the pendency of the appeal, they shall not indulge in any criminal and antisocial activity and shall have good behaviour and shall not threaten the witnesses or their family members. In case any complaint is received, it shall be properly enquired into and report, if any, is made to this Court, the bail may be cancelled.

Dt. 25.7.2007

RKS/4708/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.