Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SECHAN versus CHHOTEY LAL

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sechan v. Chhotey Lal - SECOND APPEAL No. 1157 of 1987 [2007] RD-AH 12858 (25 July 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Tarun Agarwala, J.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant.

A categorical finding of fact has been given by the Court below to the effect that the sale-deed relied upon by the appellant was not a registered  document nor it was 30 years old to enable the plaintiff to give the benefit of Section 90 of the Evidence Act. Further the trial court has given a finding that the plaintiff had never been dispossessed and that the defendants are in possession  have been inherited  the property. Subsequently, in the opinion of the Court, no substantial questions of law arises for consideration.

The second appeal is dismissed.

Dated:25.7.2007

AKJ(SA 1157/87)


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.