Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. RANI DEVI (SINCE DEAD) & ANOTHER versus SRI 1008 PUJYAPAD ADAVIT PANCHA PARMESHWAR P.A.B.UDASEEN

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Rani Devi (Since Dead) & Another v. Sri 1008 Pujyapad Adavit Pancha Parmeshwar P.A.B.Udaseen - MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. 557 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 12872 (25 July 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No.6

Civil Misc. Application No. 557 of 2007  

Smt. Rani Devi  (since deceased) and others    .. ... .... Petitioners

Versus

Sri 1008 Pujyapad Advait Panch Parmeshwar

Panchayati Akhara Bara Udaseen Kydganj,

Allahabad   ......... ......... .........   .....   Respondents  

---------

Hon'ble Janardan Sahai, J

Respondent Sri 1008 Pujyapad Advait Panch Parmeshwar Panchayati Akhara Bara Udaseen Kydganj, Allahabad obtained a decree for declaration and possession against the petitioner. The decree was put into execution. Objections under section 47 CPC were filed by the petitioners alleging that the property in dispute is not identifiable.  The objections are still pending.  It appears that the decree itself has been challenged by the petitioner in second appeal which is pending in this court. The executing court has also passed an order issuing dakhal parvana dated 11.5.2007. This order has been challenged in the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution.

The only submission made by Sri A.K.Gupta counsel for the petitioners  is that the while objections of the petitioners under Section 47 CPC are still pending the executing court could not have directed issuance of dakhal parwana.  Sri Amit Saxena counsel for the respondent concedes that the order impugned is tainted with this illegality and it has been passed before the disposal of objections under Section 47 CPC.

In view of the statement made by the counsel for the respondent this petition is allowed. The order of the executing court dated 11.5.2007 and 29.5.2007 are  set aside. It is directed that the objections under Section 47 CPC filed by the petitioners shall be disposed of expeditiously  and  if possible within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is filed before the executing court by either of the parties. The delivery of possession shall not be directed before disposal of the objections under Section 47 CPC. Counsel for the parties agree that the respective parties will not take any unnecessary adjournment.

Dt. 25.7.2007

sn


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.