High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Udai Pratap Gupta v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 33867 of 2007  RD-AH 12885 (25 July 2007)
Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.
Heard counsel for the petitioner, Sri A.K. Yadav appears for respondent no. 2. Learned standing counsel appears for the respondents No. 1 and 3. No notice is being issued to the respondent no. 4 in view of the order which is being passed .
The petitioner's case is that he was selected by the U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board for appointment as Lecturer in English and the name of the petitioner was sent for posting to the Committee of Management, A. R. D. Inter College,Babhni, Deoria - respondent no.4 but he was not permitted to join. The District Inspector of Schools has written letter dated 17.32006 to the Secretary, U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board that the petitioner cannot be permitted to join and he be adjusted to some other institution. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that rule 13 (5) has been substituted by the U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board (Second Amendment) Rules, 2007 with effect from 23.1.2007 in accordance with that the petitioner can be adjusted to some other institution.
Considering the facts of the case ends of justice be served in disposing of the writ petition directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in accordance with the amended rule 13(5) of the U.P. Secondary Education Service Selection Board (Second Amendment) Rules, 2007. and in the light of the letter dated 17.3.2006 of the District Inspector of Schools Annexure-2 to the writ petition expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
With the above observations the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.