Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHIV NARAIN RAJPUT versus STATE OF U.P

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shiv Narain Rajput v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 1263 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 1296 (22 January 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

  Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

        It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in the present case the dead body was found. Its information was given to the police station concerned. Thereafter the inquest report was prepared. The post mortem examination was conducted and thereafter the present F.I.R. has been lodged on 21.10.2006 at about 16.00 in respect of the incident which had occurred on 18.10.2006 at about 7.00 p.m. The F.I.R. has been lodged  alleging the confessional statement made by the accused in present of the first informant. There is no direct eye witness account. There is no motive or intention of the applicant to commit the alleged offence.  It is further contended that the F.I.R. has been lodged against three persons. According to the post mortem examination report the deceased has received three injuries, which were caused by hard and blunt object.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Shiv Narain Rajpoot involved in case crime no.966 of 2006  under Sections 304              I.P.C., P.S. Rath District Hamirpur                          be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

Dated: 22.1.2007

NA/1263/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.