Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RASHIDA BANO versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECRETARY (BASIC EDUCATION) AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rashida Bano v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secretary (Basic Education) And Others - WRIT - A No. 34532 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 13326 (1 August 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.

Sri Rajesh Yadav appears for respondent no. 6. Sri Anuj Kumar has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no. 3. Learned standing counsel appears for respondents No. 1,2 and 4. No notice is being issued to respondent no. 5.  Liberty is reserved to the respondents No.5  to move an application for revocation, clarification, variation and modification  of  the order  if they feel so aggrieved.

By this writ petition the petitioner has challenged  the selection of respondent no. 5 as Shiksha Mitra. Petitioner's case in the writ petition is  that the certificate submitted by the respondent no. 5, was not correct and the petitioner's application was not considered  only on the ground that her residence certificate was old.  For the grievances which are raised in the present writ petition, the petitioner has already submitted representation to the District Magistrate, copy of which has been filed as Annexure-7 to the writ petition dated 9.1.2007.

The petitioner having already represented the matter to the District Magistrate, ends of justice be served in disposing of the writ petition directing the District Magistrate to consider and take appropriate decision on the representation of the petitioner  in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order  after giving opportunity to respondent no. 5.

With the above observations the writ petition is disposed of.  

D/-1.8.2007

SCS/34532


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.