High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
Rashida Bano v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secretary (Basic Education) And Others - WRIT - A No. 34532 of 2007  RD-AH 13326 (1 August 2007)
Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.
Sri Rajesh Yadav appears for respondent no. 6. Sri Anuj Kumar has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no. 3. Learned standing counsel appears for respondents No. 1,2 and 4. No notice is being issued to respondent no. 5. Liberty is reserved to the respondents No.5 to move an application for revocation, clarification, variation and modification of the order if they feel so aggrieved.
By this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the selection of respondent no. 5 as Shiksha Mitra. Petitioner's case in the writ petition is that the certificate submitted by the respondent no. 5, was not correct and the petitioner's application was not considered only on the ground that her residence certificate was old. For the grievances which are raised in the present writ petition, the petitioner has already submitted representation to the District Magistrate, copy of which has been filed as Annexure-7 to the writ petition dated 9.1.2007.
The petitioner having already represented the matter to the District Magistrate, ends of justice be served in disposing of the writ petition directing the District Magistrate to consider and take appropriate decision on the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity to respondent no. 5.
With the above observations the writ petition is disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.