Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KAUSHAL KUMAR versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Kaushal Kumar v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 3700 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 1336 (24 January 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.

Pursuant to the advertisement by Gram Panchayat Belma Post Baluwa for the selection on the post of Shiksha Mitra the petitioner has submitted his application on 30.8.2006. A list of selected candidates was prepared in which the petitioner's name finds place at Sl.No.2. Whereas the name of Kushlawati Devi find place at Sl.no.1. Smt.Kushlawati Devi has not joined. Thereafter the petitioner should have been offered for appointment on the post of Shiksha Mitra but instead of doing so one Sri Anil Sahni son of Sri Dharm Raj whose name find place at Sl.No.3 has illegally been permitted tojoin in arbitrary manner on 26.12.2006 with collusion of the respondent. When the petitioner came to know about the aforesaid action of the respondent he has filed a representation before Chief Development Officer Gorakhpur with a copy to the District magistrate and Basic Shiksha Adhikari Gorakhpur. But the same has not yet been decided.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel Sri A.K.yadav and Sri V.K.Singh for respondents.

In the circumstances of the case,the petitioner may file a representation before respondent No.2. In case any such representation is filed, it may be decided  by respondent No.2  by a speaking order, if possible, within two months from the date of receipt of the representation after hearing all concerned. The petitioner will file certified copy of this order, other necessary documents and a duly stamped self-addressed envelope along with the representation. The respondent No.2 after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.

   With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.

Dt.24.1.2007

Hsc/3700/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.