Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM NAGINA SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Nagina Singh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 19965 of 2006 [2007] RD-AH 134 (3 January 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble (Mrs.) Saroj Bala,J.

This is an application for bail moved on behalf of the applicant Ram Nagina Singh   indicted in case crime No. 423  of 2004  under sections 120-B, 204, 409, 420  I.P.C. P.S. Bhaluwani  District Deoria.

Heard Shri S.K. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A.  and have perused the record.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that recovery certificate was issued against which criminal misc. writ petition no. 36517 of 2003 was filed by the applicant before this court and recovery proceedings and arrest was stayed. The learned counsel submitted that applicant was placed under suspension on 28.2.2002 and applicant having been handed over charge on 16.1.2002 no offence is made out against him. The learned counsel urged that applicant has not been paid any amount towards sustenance allowance after  suspension and entire amount is deposited with the department.

The learned A.G.A. submitted that applicant in his capacity as Secretary of Co-operative Society, Bhaluwani embezzled a sum of Rs. 210270.14 P.

Having taken into consideration the submissions advanced on behalf of  both the parties and without commenting on the merits of the case, I consider it to be a fit case for bail.  

Let the applicant Ram Nagina Singh   indicted in case crime No. 423 of 2004 under sections 120-B, 204, 409, 420  I.P.C. P.S. Bhaluwani  District Deoria , be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Aks/19965/06

3.1.2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.