Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

LAKSHMAN PRASAD SHARMA versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Lakshman Prasad Sharma v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 35387 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 13645 (7 August 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.

Heard counsel for the petitioner.

By this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for mandamus commanding the respondent no. 3 to issue the order of approval to selected candidates. The District Inspector of Schools by the order dated 20.5.2006 granted permission to the Principal to make selection on four posts of class IV employees after following the rules of reservation.   The Principal held certain  proceedings but on receiving certain complaints  the District Inspector of Schools by order dated 12.7.2006 has stayed his earlier permission.  The Principal thereafter by letter dated 2.12.2006 prayed for recall of the order dated 12.7.2006 and it appears that certain appointment letters dated 30.12.2006 had been issued to the selected candidates.  The Principal submitted letter dated 11.1.2007 prayer for approval  of Class IV employees which is said to be pending.  Sincere there is no approval of the selected candidates, there was no occasion for issuing any appointment letter and claim of payment of salary. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that matter is pending before the District Inspector of Schools.  It is for the District Inspector of Schools to consider as to whether sufficient grounds  made out for recall of the order dated 12.7.2006.  It is also for the District Inspector of Schools to consider and take appropriate decision in the matter relating to approval of selected candidates. No relief as prayed for in the writ petition can be granted.

Subject to above the writ petition is disposed of.

D/-7.8.2007

SCS/35387


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.