Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BIRESH KUMAR AND OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' CHIEF SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPTT.& OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Biresh Kumar And Others v. State Of U.P. Thru' Chief Secretary Education Deptt.& Others - WRIT - A No. 35790 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 13727 (8 August 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.

Heard counsel for the petitioners and the learned standing counsel.

By this writ petition the petitioners have prayed for direction to respondents to consider the petitioners' application  form in 10% seats reserved in category of Shiksha Mitra.  Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have experience  of three academic years as Shiksha Mitra. However, in view of requirement of experience of three  years under the  Government order  dated 10.7.2007, the petitioners' application forms are not being entertained.  This Court has already held in writ petition No. 34919 of 2007 ( Sanjay Kumar Singh & others   Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & others) on 2.8.2007 that three years experience as contemplated in the  Government order  dated 10.7.2007 has to be experience of Shiksha Mitra in three academic years. A Shiksha Mitra who has worked for three academic year  is entitled  to apply in 10% seats  reserved in category of Shiksha Mitra.  

the writ petition is disposed of with the observation that in case the petitioners havE experience of working Shiksha Mitra of  three academic years as required in  Government order  dated 10.7.2007 they are eligible to apply in 10% seats reserved in category of Shiksha Mitra.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.    

D/-8.8.2007

SCS/35790


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.