Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PARVEEN KHATOON versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' D.M. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Parveen Khatoon v. State Of U.P. Thru' D.M. & Others - WRIT - A No. 37661 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 14068 (16 August 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.

Learned standing counsel appears for respondent No. 1. Sri Rajesh Yadav appears for respondents No. 2 and 4. Issue notice to respondents No. 3.

Petitioner's case is that the petitioner was selected  as Shiksha Mitra and was working on the post and by order dated2.8.2007 petitioner's approval of Shiksha Mitra has been recalled on the ground that the petitioner's selection was against sub-paragraph (10 ) of Paragraph 3  of the   Government order  dated 10.10.2005.  It has been stated in paragraph 14 of the writ petition  that the petitioner's father-in-law has neither been Secretary nor President of the Gram Shiksha Samiti and  sub-paragraph (10) of Paragraph 3 of the said  Government order  is not applicable. It is further submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that no opportunity was given to the petitioner before passing of the order . From perusal of the order it does appear that no notice or opportunity was given to the petitioner.  

Considering the facts of the case and the submissions made the petitioner has made out a case for grant of interim order.

Let counter affidavit be filed within four weeks. List thereafter.

        In the mean time the order dated 2.8.2007 Annexure-6 to the writ petition  shall remain stayed.  It will however, be open for the respondent No. 2 to pass fresh order in accordance with law after giving opportunity to the petitioner.

D/-16.8.2007

SCS/37661


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.