Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Lal Dhar & Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 5091 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 14238 (20 August 2007)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble M.K. Mittal,J.

This appeal has been filed by Lal Dhar, Arvind Rai, Satya Narain Rai, Rama Kant Upadhyaya against the judgement and order dated 2.8.2007, passed by Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C. No. 3), Azamgarh, in Sessions Trial No. 338 of 2005, whereby the appellants have been found guilty and convicted under Sections 307/34 IPC and have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and fine has also been imposed on them with default stipulation.

Written objection filed by learned A.G.A. be taken on record.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned A.G.A. and perused the judgement.


Contention of learned counsel for the appellants is that appellants no. 1, 2 and 3 are alleged to have been armed with fire arms whereas appellant no. 4 with lathi. They are also alleged to have caused injuries to three injured persons. However, their injuries were found to be simple.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without prejudice to the merits of the case, appellants be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal, on each of them furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each of like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned and also on depositing of the amount of fine as imposed on them.

They shall deposit the fine as directed within a month after their released and failing it their bail shall stand cancelled.

The appellants shall give an undertaking that during the pendency of the appeal, they shall not indulge in any criminal and antisocial activity and shall have good behaviour and shall not threaten the witnesses or their family members. In case any complaint is received, it shall be properly enquired into and report, if any, is made to this court, the bail may be cancelled.

Dated: 20.8.2007

RKS/5091 of 2007


Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.