Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

FRICK INDIA LTD. versus STATE OF HARYANA

Supreme Court Cases

1994 AIR 2410 1994 SCC (5) 559 JT 1994 (7) 20 1994 SCALE (2)1043

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


FRICK INDIA LTD. V. STATE OF HARYANA [1994] RD-SC 331 (13 May 1994)

AHMADI, A.M. (J) AHMADI, A.M. (J) VENKATACHALLIAH, M.N.(CJ) VERMA, JAGDISH SARAN (J) RAY, G.N. (J) BHARUCHA S.P. (J)

CITATION: 1994 AIR 2410 1994 SCC (5) 559 JT 1994 (7) 20 1994 SCALE (2)1043

ACT:

HEADNOTE:

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by AHMADI, J.- In view of the decision rendered by the Constitution Bench in J.K. Synthetics Ltd. v. CTO1 , since the relevant provisions of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act are analogous to those of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, this petition must also succeed. We, therefore, allow this petition and direct that the amount of interest levied and collected from the petitioners under the Haryana General Sales Tax Act as well as the Central Sales Tax Act shall be refunded to the petitioners within three months from today with interest at 12% per annum from the date of actual recovery till refund. There will, however, be no order as to costs in the facts and circumstances of the case. CMP will also stand disposed of.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.