Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M/S OM STONE CRUSHER COMPANY THRU' PARTNER V.P. GARG & ORS.S versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' SECY. INDUSTRIAL DEVLP. & ORS.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M/S Om Stone Crusher Company Thru' Partner V.P. Garg & Ors.S v. State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. Industrial Devlp. & Ors. - WRIT - C No. - 41960 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 15016 (5 September 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WP No. 41960 of 2007

Hon. Yatindra Singh,J.

Hon. Vijay Kumar Verma, J.

There was a plot no. 2751situate in village Billi Markundi, Tehsil Robertsganj, District Sonbhadra. This plot has been renumbered as 4949 Kha. According to the petitioner he was granted lease after approval from the State Government to establish crusher unit in plot no. 2751and was also leased out 3.25 acres land on 17.06.1995 for 10 years and this lease has been further renewed. He has filed present writ petition against the notice dated 23.06.2007, in which plot no. 4949 Kha area 2 acres at serial no. 2 has been granted for mining lease. According to the petitioner his crusher unit over this area was installed after approval from the State Government.

We have heard counsel for the petitioners and Standing Counsel for the respondents.

In the circumstances of the case, the petitioners may file representation before respondent no. 2. In case any such representations are filed, it may be decided by respondent no. 2 by a speaking order, if possible, within one month from the date of receipt of the representations. The petitioners will file certified copy of this order, other necessary documents and a duly stamped self-addressed envelope along with the representation.

Till disposal of the representation of the petitioners by the respondent no. 2, the lease in respect of plot no. 4949 in pursuance of the notice dated 23.06.2007 shall not be finalized.

With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.

Dated: 05.09.2007.

v.k. Updh.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.