Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ANIL RAJBHAR versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Anil Rajbhar v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. - 43362 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 15289 (11 September 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.

Heard counsel for the petitioner and Sri N. Mishra appearing for the respondent No. 3 and the learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents No. 1 and 2. By consent of parties, the writ petition is being finally disposed of.

By this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing the recovery citation dated 16.4.2007 by which the petitioner has been directed to pay an of amount of Rs. 4,39,109/- with interest.

The petitioner took a loan of Rs.3,40,000/- for agriculture purpose. The petitioner deposited some of the instalments but failed to deposit the entire amount. Subsequently the Bank initiated process of recovery.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that auction of the agricultural land has not yet taken place and he is ready to pay the amount provided he is given facility to make deposit in eight equal instalments. Th counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner be given this opportunity only if auction has not taken place and further the petitioner is liable to pay the amount along with upto date interest and in case of committing any default the recovery be revived.

Considering the facts of the present case and the fact that the petitioner is a poor farmer, ends of justice be served in disposing of the writ petition by following directions:-

1. The petitioner shall deposit the entire outstanding amount along with upto date interest in eight equal quarterly instalments.

2. The first instalment be paid on or before 31st of October, 2007, and thereafter on 31st January, 2007, 30th April, 2008, 31st July, 2008, 31st October, 2008, 31st January, 2009, 30th April, 2009 and 31st July, 2009 respectively. The amount deposit after issue of citation shall be adjusted in the amount to be deposited under this order. After payment of first instalment the Bank shall provide statement of account to the petitioner giving details of outstanding amount .

3. In event of any default, the recovery shall stand revived. In event of no attachment or auction has taken place, petitioner shall not be liable to pay any recovery charges.

4. Subject to payment of the amount as directed above, the recovery in pursuance of the impugned notice shall remain stayed.

With the above directions the writ petition is disposed of.

D/-11.09.2007

SCS/43362


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.