Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M/S DIESEL FILLING STATION & ANOTHER versus CHIEF DIVISIONAL MANAGER IBP COMPANY LTD. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M/S Diesel Filling Station & Another v. Chief Divisional Manager Ibp Company Ltd. & Others - WRIT - C No. - 41558 of 1998 [2007] RD-AH 15556 (14 September 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Reserved

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.41558 of 1998

M/s Diesel Filling Station, I.B.P. Dealer Rampur Road,

Moradabad and another ............ Petitioners

Versus

Chief Divisional Manager, I.B.P. Company Limited,

Divisional Office, 3rd Floor, Jeevan Prakash, Block-I

Sanjay Palace, Agra and others ............. Respondents

Hon'ble Anjani Kumar, J.

Hon'ble Sabhajeet Yadav, J.

By this petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 5.11.1998 and 23.11.1998 contained in Annexures 5 and 6 respectively to this petition.

Petitioner no.1 is a partnership firm and petitioner no.2 is one of its partners. They are carrying on the business of sale of petroleum products of the respondent company including diesel, petroleum and lube from its pumping station situated at Rampur Road in district Moradabad. The Officers of the respondent company had made an inspection of the retail outlet of the petitioners on 19.7.1998 and submitted a report to the company. On the basis of the aforesaid report a show cause notice dated 24.7.1998 was given to the petitioners, wherein it was stated that on account of missing of totaliser seal the petitioners are guilty of breach of prevalent marketing diesel discipline guidelines. The petitioners gave reply to it on 6.8.1998. Thereafter an order dated 5.11.1998 has been passed in a very cryptic manner, whereunder a penalty of Rs.2000 has been imposed upon the petitioners supply of petroleum products was suspended for 15 days. Immediately thereafter on 23.11.1998 without any subsequent inspection and without any show cause notice, the aforesaid penalties already imposed, have been enhanced from Rs.2000/- to Rs.50,000/- and the period of suspension of supply was also enlarged from 15 days to 30 days. The petitioners have challenged both the orders dated 5.11.1998 and 23.11.1998 on the ground that the aforesaid orders have been passed without opportunity of hearing to them to have their say in the matter. Accordingly, the orders are nonest, nullity and in utter violation of principles of natural justice.

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and also perused the impugned orders. No counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents. From the perusal of impugned order dated 23.11.1998 contained in Annexure-6 of the writ petition, there is nothing to indicate that after imposition of penalty on 5.11.1998, the respondent company has made any subsequent inspection and any subsequent show cause notice has been given to the petitioners, rather the penalties imposed earlier have been enhanced without any rhyme or reason and in utter violation of principles of natural justice. Therefore, in our opinion, the impugned order dated 23.11.1998 suffers from vice of violation of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 23.11.1998 is hereby quashed. However, the respondents are at a liberty to pass fresh order after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition succeeds and is allowed to the extend indicated hereinabove.

Dt.14.09.2007

SL/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.