Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

OM NARAYAN AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Om Narayan And Another v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. - 40678 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 16118 (28 September 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

"Court No. 28"

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 40678 of 2007.

Om Narayan and another

Versus

State of U.P., through Secretary (Basic Education)

Secretariat, Lucknow and others.

***********

Hon'ble Anjani Kumar, J.

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.

The petitioners claim to have been appointed as 'Shiksha Mitra', but later on the appointment of the petitioners, namely Om Narayan and Km. Anupam are cancelled by the order dated 20th January, 2007 passed by competent authority. This order is not challenged by the petitioners by means of present writ petition. The order that is being challenged before this Court is a direction issued by Assistant Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Block Talgram, district Kannauj on 2nd August, 2007 directing the person mentioned in the aforesaid notice, namely President/Secretary of Gram Shiksha Samiti, Head Master of the school concerned and both the petitioners herein that the money that has been paid to them as salary from the month of February, 2007 to May, 2007 may be deposited by them in Gram Shiksha Nidhi. The notice further says that since the appointment of the petitioners as 'Shiksha Mitra' has been cancelled by the order dated 20th January, 2007, they are not entitled for salary beyond 20th January, 2007.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has not been able to point out as to what is the error in the impugned notice. I have also gone through the notice / order and I do not find any error.

In the result, the writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Dated: 28.09.2007.

Rks.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.