Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SATYA PRAKASH & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Satya Prakash & Another v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. - 46262 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 16188 (1 October 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Hon.Janardan Sahai,J

It is submitted that the petitioners have not made encroachment. The petitioners have filed supplementary affidavit. Counsel for the petitioners relied upon para 2 of the supplementary affidavit in which its is averred relying upon a report in a case under Section 28 of the U.P.Land Revenue Act that the area of the petitioner's plots no.628 is shown less than the actual area entered in the khatauni.

Sri N.N.iVerma holding brief of Sri V.K,.Singh counsel for respondent no.3 ghao sabha prays for and is granted three weeks' time to file counter affidavit,. The petitioners will have three weeks thereafter to file rejoinder affidavit,

Until the date of next listing, parties shall maintain status quo.

1/10/07sm

wo 46262/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.