High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Case Law Search
57km. Sunita Devi v. State Of U.P. Thru D.M., Raebareli & 3 Ors. - SERVICE SINGLE No. - 5671 of 2007  RD-AH 16361 (5 October 2007)
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH
The petitioner restricts his prayer only to the extent that his representation as contained in Annexure No.20 to the writ petition may be decided.
Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer.
Head learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
In the facts of the case, I direct the petitioner to file fresh comprehensive representation along with petition with all Annexures before concerned competent authority within ten days from today and on such representation being filed, as stipulated above, the concerned competent authority shall decide the same within one week of the receipt of representation, as contemplated above, exercising its unfettered discretion on the basis of record before him in accordance with relevant Rules, Government Orders, Scheme/Policy without being influenced by any of the observations in this judgement, since this Court has not entered into the merits of the present case.
Accordingly, the petition is finally disposed of.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.