Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SOHEL GUPTA @ SOHIT GUPTA versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sohel Gupta @ Sohit Gupta v. State Of U.P. & Others - CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16076 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 16569 (10 October 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Crl. Misc. Writ Petition No. 16076 of 2007

Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli, J.

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.

We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The contention of the petitioner that after being detained in civil prison, the petitioner's health suddenly deteriorated because of which government officials incharge of the prison ran away does not inspire confidence. That is not how this happens normally. On the other hand, the story set-up in the first information report that the relatives of the petitioner, who were presurrising for the release of the petitioner from the civil prison assembled with about 100 people, who forcibly entered the lock up and took away the detenue, appears to be more probable having regard to the general tendencies these days.

The above observations are only prima facie observations for the purpose of deciding this writ petition.

Quashing of the first information report and stay of arrest is granted normally when the incident alleged in the first information report is so highly unnatural or improbable that it would seem in all probability to be false, or where the averments in the first information report are proved to be false on the face of it by clinching material.

In these circumstances, we are unable to agree with the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner regarding quashing of the first information report or staying the arrest.

But, considering the fact that the petitioner appears to be of reasonably affluent circumstances, having regard to the amount which was due from the petitioner, we direct that if the petitioner surrenders and applies for bail within 10 days from today, in case crime No. 2444 of 2007 under section 147/149/332/353 I.P.C. and 6/7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Kotwali Bareilly district Bareilly, his bail application will be considered and disposed of by both the Courts below as expeditiously as possible.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Dated: October 10, 2007

AM/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.