Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Satish & Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 6922 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 16703 (12 October 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble R.K.Rastogi,J.


Appeal appears to be arguable.


Issue notice.

Notice on behalf of the State has been acdepted by the learned A.G.A.

List and connect this appeal with Crl.Appeal no. 6610 of 2007.

Also heard on the prayer of bail.

The appellants were convicted and sentenced vide judgment and order dated 14.9.2007 and 28.9.2007 passed by the Special Judge, S.C./S.T. Act, Bulandshahr in S.T. no. 976 of 2002, State Vs. Satish and others, under sections 147, 324./149, 325/149, I.P.C. and section 3(1)(10) of the S.C./S.T. Act.

It is reported that the appellants were on bail during trial and they did not misuse the liberty of bail during trial. They have also been granted interim bail by the court below till filing of the appeal and have also deposited the amount of fine.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the appellants should be bailed out during pendency of this appeal.

Let the appellants, Satish, Girish, Ajay, Pintu and Sintu be released on bail on their each executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

The learned counsel for the appellants submits that parentage of the appellants no.1, 2 and 3 is Ram Charan and it has been erroneously written as Ram Baran in the ,memo of appeal so it may be corrected. No application for correction has been moved.

It appears from perusal of the certified copy of the judgment filed by the appellants that in this certified copy also their parentage has been described as Ram Baran and this parentage has not only been stated in the description of the names of the parties at the top of the judgment, but in the body of the judgment also they have been described as sons of Ram Baran at each and every place.

Under these circumstances, unless and until the appellants seek correction of their parentage before the trial court and unless and until the trial court passes suitable order for correction of the so called mistake in the parentage, it is not possible for this Court to permit change in the parentage.

Certified copy of this order be issued today to the learned counsel for the appellants on payment of usual charges as per rules.



Crl.Appeal .6922/07


Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.