Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAMA KANT & ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rama Kant & Another v. State Of U.P. & Others - SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 1402 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 16903 (25 October 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Special Appeal No. 1402 of 2007

Rama Kant and another vs. State of U.P. and others

****

Hon'ble H.L.Gokhale,CJ

Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J

Date: October 25, 2007

Oral Judgement (Per:H.L.Gokhale,CJ)

1. Heard Mr. S.P. Pandey in support of this appeal. Mr. A.K. Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appears for the State-respondents.

2. The appellants herein are the Seasonal Collection Amins in the Revenue Department in district Gorakhpur. They wanted regularisation. It was necessary that the persons concerned must show that they have made collection above 70% of the target given to them. At all relevant time, the appellants failed to attain the target and therefore they could not be regularised. An earlier order of this Court directed that their representation to be considered. Their representation was considered and a detailed order was passed by the District Magistrate. That led to one more petition. The learned Single Judge has gone into all aspects and dismissed the petition.

3. Mr. Pandey, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the recoveries/collections had to be seen in proportion to the target. That is what we find from the order passed by the District Magistrate. This has also been specifically placed in the counter filed by the State to which there is no reply in the rejoinder.

4. This being the position, there is no error in the order passed by the learned Single Judge. The appeal is dismissed.

Date:25.10.2007

RK/ (Chief Justice)

` (Pankaj Mithal,J)


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.