Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MANGALA PRASAD JAISWAL versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mangala Prasad Jaiswal v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. - 52416 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 16962 (26 October 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

By this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to recognise the Shiksha Visharad degree conferred by Hindi Sahitya Sammelan.

The petitioners' case is that they are graduates and are entitled to submit applications in response to advertisement for Special B.T.C. Training Course 2007.

The degree, which the petitioners possess, is a degree of Shiksha Visharad granted by Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Allahabad. It is not even the case of the petitioners that Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Allahabad is a recognised institution under the provisions of National Council For Teachers Education Act, 1993, for imparting training.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has referred to an order of the Lucknow Bench of this Court dated 1.11.2004, passed in writ petition No. 1859 (M/s) of 2004, Om Prakash and others Vs. State of U.P. and others, in which this Court permitted the petitioners to represent with regard to Special B.T.C. Training Course (2004). The only observation made in the above case was that in case, the representation is made, the same be decided in accordance with law. The said order in any manner, does not help the petitioners. The degree of Shiksha Visharad obtained by the petitioners from Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Allahabad, does not entitle them to be eligible for applying in the Special B.T.C. Training Course 2007.

The writ petition is dismissed.

Dated: 26.10.2007

Rakesh/- 52416/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.