Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MAHENDRA YADAV versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mahendra Yadav v. State Of U.P. & Others - CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 17635 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 17217 (31 October 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Court no. 37

Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 17635 of 2007

Mahendra Yadav.............................................................Petitioner

Versus

State of U.P. and others..................................................Respondents.

Hon. Imtiyaz Murtaza, J.

Hon. Ajai Kumar Singh, J.

Challenge in this petition is to the F.I.R. lodged at case crime no. 1470 of 2007 under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 469, 471, 120 B and 34 I.P.C. and Section 7/12/13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act at P.S. Akbar Pur District Kanpur Dehat.

The petitioner who is presently posted as Addl. S.P. (Rural Area) Agra, was then a member of the Recruitment Board constituted by the Director General of Police U.P for recruitment of Constables and the allegations in the F.I.R. relate to corrupt practices indulged in by them in the recruitment of constables in the Civil Police, P.A.C and Police Radio for the year 2005-2006. The basis of the F.I.R. appears to be the complaints and subsequent report submitted by the Committee headed by Sri Shailjakant Mishra which was constituted to go into the tenability of the allegations about corrupt practices employed in the recruitment of constables.

The learned counsel also canvassed that certain writ petitions were also preferred challenging the recruitment of constable attended with the prayer to order C.B.I. enquiry which all, according to learned counsel, have culminated in dismissal.

In this connection, it is worthy of notice that a coordinate Bench of this Court in various writ petitions including Criminal writ petition No. 14709 of 2007 in which challenge was to the F.I.R. embodying self same allegations registered at case crime No. 1552 of 2007 under section 419, 420, 467, 468, 469, 471, 120 B 34 I.P.C. and section 12/7/13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act P.S. Kotwali District Ghazipur have passed orders staying arrest of the petitioner till submission of charge sheet or till further orders of the Court.

In deference to the order of coordinate Bench and regard being had to the fact that the allegations embodied in the F.I.R. under scrutiny in all material aspects are almost similar with the allegations in other writ petitions including Crl. writ petition namely No. 14708 of 2007, we also direct that the petitioner namely, Vinai Kumar Yadav wanted in case crime no. 455 of 2007 under sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 469, 471, 120 B 34 I.P.C. and section 12/7/13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act registered at P.S. Civil Lines District Etawah shall not be arrested till next listing or till submission of charge sheet whichever is earlier.

MH

31.10.2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.