DISTRICT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR AURRIYA versus PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

District Assistant Registrar Aurriya v. Prescribed Authority & Others - WRIT - C No. - 52854 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 17274 (1 November 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Janardan Sahai, J.

Supplementary affidavit filed today.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent nos. 5 and 6 were not the employees of the Cooperative Department and the District Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Aurraiya against whom the order has been passed has no concern with the payment of gratuity and in fact the respondents are the employees of the society and liability of making the payment is of respondents 3 and 4.

In view of the contention advanced the execution of the order dated 26.7.2007 passed by the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act shall remain stayed until the next date of listing.

List this case in the second week of January 2008.

1.11.2007.

s.wp.52854/07.

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.