Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Kishan Pratap Singh v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT - C No. - 54467 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 17340 (2 November 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble Janardan Sahai, J

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Sri Vikas Dixit holding brief of Sri Vipin Sinha, counsel for the Bank.

Petitioners had taken loan for agricultural purposes. According to the petitioner they could not pay the instalments due to unavoidable circumstances and the loan is being recovered by coercive means. It is submitted that if reasonable time is allowed to pay the amount sought to be recovered in instalment, petitioners may be able to pay the same and irreparable injury on account of arrest and auction of property may be avoided.

To the aforesaid, learned counsel appearing for contesting respondent submits that although in some of the cases it has been said that against the recovery proceedings, unless some illegality is pointed out, the court may not interfere, but at the same time submission is that intention of the respondent bank has been never to cause any irreparable injury to the loanee rather the loan amount was advanced with the purpose to improve their future prospects and thus if for justifiable reason the amount in terms of the agreement has not been paid and now petitioners have bona fide intention to pay the amount within a reasonable time then respondents may not have any objection.

Accordingly, this petition is disposed of finally with the following directions:-

(i) Petitioners may deposit the entire amount sought to be recovered directly with the contesting respondent no. 4 Bank in seven equal instalments. In calculating the arrears the amount (if any) already paid will be adjusted.

(ii) The first instalment may be deposited by 3rd December 2007, second by 3rd March 2008, third by 2nd June 2008, fourth by 2nd September 2008, fifth by 2ndt December 2008, sixth by 2nd March 2009 and the last/seventh instalment by 2nd June 2009. In case instalments are deposited with the contesting respondent within the aforesaid time then the recovery charges will not be recovered from the petitioner.

(iii) Petitioners may file an application for supply of statement of account along with duly stamped self- addressed envelope. In case any such application is filed, the contesting respondent will give the same to the petitioners within fifteen days after the deposit of first instalment.

iv) Property (agricultural land/tractor) belonging to the petitioners if attached will be released after the deposit of first instalment by the concerned Tehsil authority unless it has already been auctioned.

(v) If the petitioners deposit the instalment as fixed by this Court in time the recovery shall be kept in abeyance but if the petitioners default in paying any of the instalment this order shall stand vacated.

(vi) This order will not be applicable if the petitioners have filed any earlier writ petition challenging the recovery of this loan.

Dated: 2.11.2007.



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.