Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. PUSHPA DEVI AND OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Pushpa Devi And Others v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. - 55778 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 17812 (14 November 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

COURT NO.39

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 55778 of 2007

Smt. Pushpa Devi and others ............................................ Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttar Pradesh & others ............................... Respondents

....................................

Hon'ble Ashok Bhushan, J.

By means of present writ petition, petitioners are seeking writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to permit them to complete training of B. T. C. in terms of Government orders dated 6.9.1994 and 27.12.2004.

The petitioners' case is that they were working as untrained Assistant teachers. The petitioners have stated that the State Government has issued Government order dated 6.9.1994 for providing training to the untrained teachers working in recognised institutions. Petitioners' further case is that their names were forwarded for training and they were imparted training from 26th October, 1995 to 4th November, 1995. The State Government has subsequently issued an order dated 27.12.2004 providing for imparting training by correspondence course but those who fulfil the eligibility as laid down in paragraph 3 of the Government order . The petitioners have represented to the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Deoria praying that the petitioners be allowed to complete the training and their result be declared. Copy of one of the representations dated 10.9.2007 has been filed as Annexure-7 to the writ petition. The petitioners' claim requires adjudication of facts which h as to be done by the authorities themselves. The petitioners having already represented the matter to the Basic Shiksha Adhikari. Appropriate decision be taken by the Basic Shiksha Adhikari after verifying the claim of the petitioners and in case the petitioners were found to be entitled their names be forwarded to the competent authority for taking appropriate decision in accordance with law. The Basic Shiksha Adhikari shall consider and take appropriate decision expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.

With the aforesaid direction the writ petition is disposed of.

D/-14.11.2007

SCS


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.