Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Bindu Rai v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. 4212 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 1825 (6 February 2007)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.

The petitioner claims  herself to be adopted daughter of Baleshwar Rai and has filed the writ petition for considering her appointment on compassionate ground. The petitioner's father  was Asstt.Teacher and died in harness in 1991. An application was filed by the petitioner seeking appointment pursuant to the G.O. dated 4.9.2000. In para 8 of the aforesaid G.O. it is stated that if any application for seeking appointment on compassionate ground is filed after five years of the death of the employee in that case the matter can only be considered for the purposes of condonation of delay   by the State Government. The case of the petitioner is that Secretary Basic Shiksha Parishad forwarded the application of the petitioner to Special Secretary Basic Education U.P. Lucknow on 16.8.2001 and thereafter reminder was also sent on 19.12.2002  but no decision has been taken  in the case of the petitioner by the State Government. Aggrieved from this, the present writ petition has been filed.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner,learned Standing Counsel and Sri Suresh Singh for respondent no.2.

In the circumstances of the case,the petitioner may file a representation before respondent No.4. In case any such representation is filed, it may be decided  by respondent No.4  by a speaking order, if possible, within two months from the date of receipt of the representation. The petitioner will file certified copy of this order, other necessary documents and a duly stamped self-addressed envelope along with the representation. The respondent No.4 after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioner.

   With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.




Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.