Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VIRENDRA SINGH CHANDEL versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Virendra Singh Chandel v. State Of U.P. & Others - SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 1599 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 18364 (27 November 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CJ's Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Special Appeal No. 1599 of 2007

Virendra Singh Chandel

Vs.

State of U.P. and others

*****

Hon'ble H.L. Gokhale, C.J.

Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal, J.

Date: 27.11.2007

P.C.

1. Heard Mr. S.P. Pandey in support of this appeal.

2. The appellant is working as Revenue Inspector-II in Nagar Nigam, Agra. He has been suspended. The suspension order has been passed by the Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Agra. The suspension order was challenged in a writ petition. The petition has been dismissed by the learned Single Judge.

3. In this appeal Mr. Pandey submits that the appellant is not responsible for the alleged overwriting in the assessment notice. It is the responsibility of some other sub-ordinate employee. He further makes a grievance against the Commissioner, Nagar Nigam.

4. As far as the allegation against the petitioner are concerned he must meet the same in the departmental inquiry. The allegations made against the Commissioner are not relevant and cannot vitiate the suspension order.

5. We may however, observe that the inquiry will be completed at the earliest, preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of this order provided the appellant cooperates with the inquiry. In the event the appellant does not cooperate with the inquiry the time will get extended. However, if the appellant cooperates and the inquiry is not completed within time stipulated the respondents will revoke the order of suspension.

6. The appeal is dismissed with the above observations.

Dt. 27.11.2007

S.S.

(Chief Justice)

(Pankaj Mithal, J)


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.