Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MOHD. MIYAN KHAN versus PEERZADA KHADIM KAMROOL ZAFAR & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mohd. Miyan Khan v. Peerzada Khadim Kamrool Zafar & Others - CIVIL REVISION No. - 469 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 18401 (28 November 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Hon. Dilip Gupta, J.

This Civil Revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed for setting aside the order dated 29th September, 2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Badaun, in Miscellaneous Case No. 6 of 2007.

I have heard Sri S.K. Mehrotra learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Manoj Misra for the respondents.

A partition suit was filed in which a preliminary decree was prepared on the basis of a compromise. Subsequently, the Commissioner prepared a preliminary partition scheme. Objections were filed by the revisionist but the same have been rejected by the order dated 22nd September, 2007.

Learned counsel for the revisionist has placed reliance upon Clause 10 of the Compromise Decree. This Clause 10 cannot be read dehors the provisions of Clause 7 of the Compromise Decree. It is only in a situation where the plaintiffs agreed for inclusion of the defendants in their ''Kuras' that they will have a right, but if the plaintiffs did not agree, the defendants will have no right in the ''Kuras' of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs have not agreed to the inclusion of defendant No. 1. The preliminary partition scheme has been prepared on this basis.

In such circumstances, there is no illegality in the order passed by the Court below.

The Civil Revision is, accordingly, dismissed.

Date: 28.11.2007

NSC-469


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.