BANARSAI LAL PRAJAPATI versus STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Banarsai Lal Prajapati v. State Of U.P. & Others - WRIT TAX No. - 1667 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 18625 (5 December 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Writ Petition (Tax) No. 1667 of 2007

Hon'ble Sushil Harkauli, J.

Hon'ble Rakesh Sharma, J.

The petitioner has admittedly not deposited tax after 1998. We do not think that the petitioner has any right to require the respondents to give statement of account in such a situation.

For seeking relief from the equitable jurisdiction of this Court, the petitioner must do equity and come with clean hands by depositing at least the admitted tax.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed.

However, if the admitted tax is deposited up to date that is for the past 9 years during which the petitioner has not paid a single penny, the petitioner will be at liberty to file a fresh writ petition.

Dated : December 5, 2007

AM/-

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.