CHINTAMANI SHARMA versus RAJIV KUMAR CHAURASIYA AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Chintamani Sharma v. Rajiv Kumar Chaurasiya And Others - WRIT - C No. - 59975 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 18628 (5 December 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Hon. Dilip Gupta, J.

The petitioner filed an application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC in the pending Original Suit for being impleaded as a defendant claiming that he is a tenant of the property in dispute. In the Original Suit the dispute is as to who would be the owner of the property in dispute. The Court below has rightly rejected the application as the petitioner is not a necessary party. There is, therefore, no infirmity in the order passed by the Court below.

The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

Dt/- 5.12.2007

Sharma/59975

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.