Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

HARISH CHANDRA GUPTA versus THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Harish Chandra Gupta v. The State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. - 37929 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 18632 (5 December 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble S. Rafat Alam, J.

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.

In the instant petition, the short grievance of the petitioner is that U.P. Public Service Commission is not convening the meeting of D.P.C. for the purpose of promotion from the post of Junior Engineer to Assistant Engineer in the Minor Irrigation Department on the pretext that some interim order of this Court is operative. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that interim order dated 24.5.2007 passed in Writ Petition No. 65992 of 2006, Jagdish Narain Vs. State of U.P. lapsed and, thus, now there is no hurdle before the Commission in convening D.P.C. meeting.

Sri Varshney, learned counsel appearing for Commission, Sri Rajeev Mishra appearing in C.M.W.P. No. 65992 of 2006 and Sri Prabhat Kumar Singh, holding brief of Sri G.K. Singh and Sri Budhwar appearing for respondents no. 4 to 8 in C.M.W.P. No. 65992 of 2006, Sri Girish Vishvkarma, learned counsel for the petitioner in C.M.W.P. No. 65992 of 2006 have no objection so far holding of D.P.C. meeting is concerned. They submit that Commission be directed to convene meeting of D.P.C. at the earliest.

In view of the submission and looking to the facts of the case and also in view of the fact that the interim order dated 24.5.2007 was not extended, hence, lapsed, as submitted by the learned counsels for the parties, U.P. Public Service Commission, respondent no. 5, is directed to convene D.P.C. meeting at an early date as per their convenience.

It is further directed that the Commission shall make the recommendation after selection at the earliest.

With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

Dt. 5.12.2007

PS-37929/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.