Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

FAZAL AHMAD CHISTI versus D.I.O.S. AND ANR.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Fazal Ahmad Chisti v. D.I.O.S. And Anr. - WRIT - A No. - 28485 of 1991 [2007] RD-AH 18758 (11 December 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Court No. 26

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 28485 of 1991

Fazal Ahma Chisti

Vs.

State of U.P. and others

Hon'ble V.K. Shukla,J.

At the point of time when the matter has been taken up petitioner has confined his request to the relief that once U.P. Public Services Tribunal has passed order in his favour with all consequential benefits and directed the petitioner to be adjusted against the post held by N.D. Agarwal with effect from 09.03.1981 then at least w.e.f. 09.03.1981 said period ought to have been clubbed in his service at the point of time of fixation of salary and grant of revised pay scale. Petitioner further submits that qua the G.P.F. no requisite steps has been undertaken for opening the Account. In this background petitioner submits that the order of District Inspector of Schools in respect of fixation of salary lacks objective consideration.

In these circumstances as order of fixation does not contain any reason as such liberty is given to the petitioner to represent his claim for consideration on these two facets before District Inspector of Schools Pilibhit who is directed to take requisite decision in this regard in accordance with law within next three months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order keeping in view the decision of U.P. Public Services Tribunal qua that the post vacated by Sri N.D. Agarwal on 09.03.1981 directives were issued declaring the same to be held by the petitioner from the said particular date.

With the above direction present writ petition is disposed of.

No orders as to cost.

11.12.2007

Dhruv


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.