Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

HARISH CHANDRA UPADHYAYA versus STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Harish Chandra Upadhyaya v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - A No. - 66677 of 2005 [2007] RD-AH 18805 (12 December 2007)

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.

Sri M.N. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that Consolidation Commissioner, U.P. has already passed an order on 20.9.2001 observing that the petitioner was paid retiral benefits after two years and five months and proceedings for fixing responsibility for such delay against the officer concerned and also with respect to payment of interest to the petitioner for such delay is under consideration and the matter shall be finalized after completion of those proceedings.

It is, however, said that the said proceedings have not been completed and so far neither the petitioner has been paid any interest nor any final order has been passed.

Learned standing counsel submitted that the aforesaid proceedings would be finalized expeditiously.

In view of the aforesaid statement and with the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, without expressing any opinion of the merits of the case, the respondent no. 2 is directed to finalize the proceedings as observed in order dated 20.9.2001 within two months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order by passing a reasoned order and commutate the same to the petitioner within 15 days thereafter.

In case, it is found that the petitioner is entitled for any interest, the same shall also be paid to him within three months thereafter.

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of.

Dt. 12.12.2007

PS-66677/05


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.