Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SATYAVIR AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Satyavir And Another v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 1749 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 2177 (9 February 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Reserved

Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1749 of 2007

1.Satyaveer

2.Chatar Singh..................................Applicants

Versus

State of U.P...................................Respondent.

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh,J.

Heard Sri Digvijay Singh, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for State of U.P., Sri S.N. Singh and Sri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the complainant.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that there is a cross version of the alleged incident. From both sides, F.I.R. have been registered and both sides have received injuries. From the side of the prosecution one person has lost the life and one person has received injuries. From the side of the applicants one person namely Satya Prakash son of the co-accused  Chatar Singh received injury. The injuries received by the applicants side have not been explained because the injured Satya Prakash had received head injury and there was a fracture to right temporal bone. He was medically examined on 18.9.2006 at about 3.30 p.m.  at S.N. Medical College, Hospital, Agra.

In reply to the above contention it is submitted by the learned A.G.A. and the leaned counsel for the complainant, that the cross F.I.R. was registered in Case Crime No. 326A of 2006 under section 147,307,452,323,504 I.P.C. in which final report has been submitted. In fact, it was not a cross case because in both the cases the place of occurrence are different even the time of occurrence is not the same. Satya Prakash who allegedly received injuries from the applicants side is not an  accused in the present case and his house was far away from the alleged place of occurrence. Therefore, the accused persons were having no right of self defense.

Considering the facts, circumstances of the case and the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.G.A. and the learned counsel for the complainant and considering the fact that Satya Prakash son of the co-accused Chatar singh had received head injury, which was having fracture in the right temporal bone, the house of the applicants was in front of the  alleged place of occurrence and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicants are entitled for bail.

Let the applicants Satyaveer and Chatar Singh, involved in case crime no. 326  of 2006  under Sections 147,324,504,307 302 I.P.C., P.S. Sadabad District   Hathras be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicants shall not tamper with the evidence and they shall report to the court of C.J.M. concerned in the first week of each month till conclusion of the trial to show his good conduct and behaviour.  

In case of default of any of the above condition, the bail granted to the applicants shall be deemed cancelled and the applicants shall be taken into custody by the C.J.M. concerned.

Dt.9.2.2007

RPD/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.