Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details


High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation


Radha Govind College Of Education Thru' Its Secry. v. State Of U.P. And Others - WRIT - C No. 3272 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 2265 (12 February 2007)


This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).


Court No. 33

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 3272 of 2007

Radha Govind College of Education       Vs.        State of U.P. And others

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vineet Saran.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned standing counsel appearing for Respondent no. 1; Sri Neeraj Tripathi for Respondent no.2 and Sri Anurag Khanna for Respondents no. 3 and 4. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being disposed of at this stage without calling for a counter affidavit.

The petitioner claims that he had been granted temporary affiliation for running B.Ed. Course in the session 2004-05. For granting affiliation in the subsequent academic session 2005-06 the Chancellor had called for a report from the University which, according to the petitioner, was not sent by the University. Hence this writ petition has been filed with the prayer for a direction to the University to get the inspection done and submit its report to the Chancellor and further that affiliation for the session 2005-06 onwards for running B.Ed. Course be granted.

The prayer made in this writ petition appears to be justified to the extent that since the petitioner had already been granted temporary affiliation for one session, the University ought to have submitted its report to the Chancellor for further affiliation. However, the session 2005-06 is nearly coming to an end as even though the examinations for the said sessions may not have been held but direction for grant of affiliation at the fag end of the session would be meaningless, but merely because of the session 2005-06 coming an end should not deprive the petitioner institution from seeking affiliation for the subsequent sessions. I am informed by the learned counsel for the respondents that admission for B.Ed. Course for the session 2006-07 has yet not begun. Sri Anurag Khanna, learned counsel for the respondent-University has submitted that after conducting the inspection, the report with regard to affiliation to the petitioner-institution for running B.Ed. Course shall be sent to the Chancellor within three weeks from today.

In such circumstances it is provided that on receipt of the inspection report from the University, the Chancellor may take appropriate decision with regard to grant of affiliation to the petitioner-institution for running B.Ed. Course from the session 2006-07 onwards, in accordance with law, expeditiously.

This writ petition stands allowed to the extent indicated above. No order as to cost.

dt.  12.2.2007



Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites


dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.