Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM SINGH versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Singh v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 25719 of 2006 [2007] RD-AH 227 (4 January 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

  Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.and Sri S.K. Mishra learned counsel for the complainant.

        It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that   the applicant is named in the F.I.R. In the F.I.R. the applicant and four other co-accused persons were named as accused. According to the F.I.R. the applicant discharged shots by rifle which hit at the stomach of the deceased. During investigation the statement of the injured Ram Pal Singh was recorded. He did not disclose the name of the applicant as accused whereas the role of firing was assigned to the other co-accused. Considering the statement of the injured and other material collected by the I.O. he came to the conclusion that the applicant was falsely implicated. Therefore, charge sheet was not submitted against the applicant but at the stage of trial, the applicant has been summoned by the trial court in exercise of power conferred under section 319 Cr.P.C. along with the co-accused Lallan Singh and Naresh. The remaining co-accused who are facing trial have already been released on bail.

In reply of the above contention it is submitted by the learned A.G.A. and the learned counsel for the complainant that the applicant is having criminal antecedent. He is involved in three criminal cases.

Let the applicant Ram Singh

involved in case crime no. 249      of 2002 under Sections  147,148,149,307,302 I.P.C., and 3(2)(5) S.C./S.T. Act P.S.  Katra  District Shahjahanpur be released on bail on hsi furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicants shall not tamper with the evidence  they shall  report to the court of C.J.M. concerned in the first week of each month till conclusion of the trial to show their  good conduct and behaviour.

In default of the above condition the bail granted to him shall be deemed cancel the he shall be taken into custody by the C.J.M. concerned.

Dated: 4.1.2007

NA/25719/06


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.