Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JEET NARAYAN AND OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Jeet Narayan And Others v. State Of U.P. - CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 950 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 2342 (13 February 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble M. K. Mittal, J.

This appeal has been filed by Jeet Narayan, Jag Narayan and Mannu  against the judgement and order dated 27.1.2007 passed by Addl.Sessions Judge, F.T.C. No. 1, Mirzapur whereby the appellants have been found guilty and convicted under Sections 147, 148, 324 IPC and  have been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment up to two years and the appellant Jag Narayan and Mannu have been found guilty and convicted under Sections 147, 148, 323 IPC and have been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment up to one year and fine has also been imposed on all the appellants with default stipulation.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

Admit.

Co accused Shyamdhar and Girja have preferred criminal appeal No. 709 of 2007against the impugned judgement. This appeal be convicted with the above noted appeal.

Learned counsel for the appellants has contended that appellants are on interim bail in this matter.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without prejudice to the merits of the case, appellants shall continue on bail during the pendency of the appeal on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each of like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned and also on depositing the amount of fine as imposed on them. They shall also give an undertaking that they will not indulge in any criminal or antisocial activity and if any report is found against them, it shall be open for the court below to report to this court so that their bail may be cancelled.

Dt.13.2.2007

RKS/950/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.