Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. GAYATRI DEVI versus STATE OF U.P. THRU' NIDESHAK BAL VIKAS SEWA EVAM P. & ORS.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Gayatri Devi v. State Of U.P. Thru' Nideshak Bal Vikas Sewa Evam P. & Ors. - WRIT - A No. 7723 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 2379 (13 February 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Court No. 38

Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 7723 of 2006

Smt. Gayatri Devi

Versus

State of U.P and others

Hon'ble V.K.Shukla,J.

Petitioner applied for consideration of her candidature as Aanganbari Karyakatri. Petitioner was selected by virtue of belonging from below poverty line category. Subsequent to the same, complaints were made, that income certificate of the petitioner is based on totally false and incorrect facts. Inquiry was got conducted and in the said inquiry it has been accepted by the petitioner that husband of the petitioner is running a medical store and further her father in law is Ex-Principal. On the basis of inquiry made as income certificate of the petitioner was based on totally incorrect facts the appointment of the petitioner has been cancelled.

In the entire body of the writ petition there is no challenge to the fact that husband of the petitioner owns medical store and thus, this admission on the part of the petitioner that her husband owns medical store, clearly substantiates that she does not belong to below poverty line category. Cogent reason has been given by the District Magistrate for cancelling the candidature of the petitioner. Once valid reasons are there and appointment has been offered to the petitioner on the basis of incorrect  certificate, as such there is no occasion to interfere with the said finding of fact.

Consequently writ petition lacks substance and is dismissed.

13.02.2007

Dhruv  


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.