Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. VIDYA DEVI & OTHERS versus STATE OF U.P.

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Vidya Devi & Others v. State Of U.P. - WRIT - C No. 31974 of 2002 [2007] RD-AH 242 (4 January 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Yatindra Singh,J.

Hon'ble Ran Vijai Singh, J.

1.    Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead the Collector as respondent no.2.

2.  The land of the petitioner/ petitioner's predecessor was declared as surplus land under the Urban Ceiling Act. This Act has been repealed. According to the petitioners they are still in actual physical possession over the land declared as surplus land and as such possession can not be taken from them.

3.    We have heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing counsel for the respondents.

4.    It is not disputed that the Act has been repealed and no further proceeding can be taken if the petitioners are in actual physical possession of the excess land.

5.   In the circumstances of the case, the petitioners may file a representation before respondent No.2 within a month. In case any such representation is filed, it may be decided  by respondent No.2  by a speaking order, if possible, within three months from the date of receipt of the representation. The petitioners will file certified copy of this order, other necessary documents and a duly stamped self-addressed envelope along with the representation. The respondent No.2 after taking decision will communicate the same to the petitioners. Till the  disposal of the petitioners' representation the parties shall maintain status quo.

6.   With these observations the writ petition is disposed of.

Dt. 4.1.2007

Hsc/31974/02


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.