Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DINANATH SINGH versus STATE OF U.P

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Dinanath Singh v. State Of U.P - CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. 3152 of 2007 [2007] RD-AH 2429 (14 February 2007)

 

This is an UNCERTIFIED copy for information/reference. For authentic copy please refer to certified copy only. In case of any mistake, please bring it to the notice of Joint Registrar(Copying).

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ALLAHABAD

Hon'ble Ravindra Singh, J.

  Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

        It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the role of catching hold is assigned to the applicant whereas the role of causing injury is assigned to the co-accused Sonu Singh

In reply to the above contention it is submitted by the learned A.G.A. and the learned counsel for the complainant that the applicant has been convicted for the offence punishable under section 304 I.P.C. against which he has filed criminal appeal which is pending in which he has been released on bial.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

Let the applicant Dinanath Singh involved in case crime no.  750      of 2006  under Sections 302            I.P.C.,P.S. Chiluatal District Gorakhpur be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the condition that the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence and he shall report to the court of C.J.M. concerned in the first week of each month till conclusion of the trial to show his good behaviour.

In  default  of the above condition the bail granted  him shall be deemed cancelled and he shall be taken into custody by the learned C.J.M. concerned

Dated: 14.2.2007

NA/3152/07


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.